When doing an etune, you can only control so much of the equation. If you had two 100% identical cars one dyno tuned, the tuner could technically “E-tune” the second car just using the first cars tune and it would be just as good. I think the biggest difference is going to be in eliminating variables.
E-tunes generally err on the side of caution, and help if the customer at least knows some basics about tuning parameters so they don’t drive around on a too aggressive tune or let off if thing’s don’t look good. WinZip makes it easy to encrypt, share, compress, and manage your files Enjoy direct integration with popular cloud services and keep files safe with apps for Windows, Mac, Android, and iOS. Is it safe to say that these auxiliary functions would be much more developed from a tuner that is specific to this platform like Delicious?Īssuming it’s the same tuner doing both then most likely.įunctionality there is no difference on what is possible between a etune or dyno tune, Besides seeing power numbers, and being able to monitor and change things real time. These functions change how the tune reacts to various sensor inputs, alter throttle response, etc.
Will a custom in-person dyno tune always produce slightly better numbers than an e-tune?Īlso, I believe tuners make custom auxiliary functions that run via EcuTek on the ECU which are included in their tunes.
0 kommentar(er)
